Michael Vrbensky vs Woobin Shin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does Woobin Shin's recent second serve performance compare to Michael Vrbensky's? Woobin Shin has a slight edge, winning 43.03% of points, compared to Vrbensky's 41.23%.
• When it comes to returning second serves, Michael Vrbensky holds an advantage with a 48.23% win rate versus Woobin Shin's 43.07%.
• Vrbensky also surpasses Shin in returning first serves, winning 27.22% of points compared to Shin's 25.57%.
• Under pressure, Vrbensky has a slim edge, saving 54.85% of breakpoints compared to Shin's 52.97%.
• Overall match performance over the last year shows Woobin Shin winning 58.46% of matches, outpacing Vrbensky who has a 46.43% win rate.
• Which player prefers indoor hard courts? Woobin Shin excels on I.hard surfaces with a 58% win rate, whereas Vrbensky performs best on clay with the same 58% win percentage.
• Woobin Shin mainly competes at the Futures/ITF level and has won 64.29% of those matches, while Vrbensky plays primarily at the Challengers level, winning 45%.
• Considering the quality of opponents, Vrbensky has faced players with an average ranking of 413.89, higher than Shin's opponents at 540.8.
• In deciding sets, Shin is more successful, winning 47% of such scenarios, while Vrbensky has only won 18% of deciding sets.
• Yet in recent breakpoint conversions, Vrbensky is ahead, converting 41.38% compared to Shin's 34.55%.

Editorial Prediction (November 18, 2025, UTC):

Woobin Shin and Michael Vrbensky are set to face off in an intriguing matchup. Shin's slightly better second serve performance gives him a small edge over Vrbensky. However, Vrbensky's stronger return game statistics, especially on second serves, suggest he could counteract this advantage effectively.

While both players show strengths under pressure, Vrbensky saves a higher percentage of breakpoints, hinting at his ability to stay resilient during crucial moments. Shin, on the other hand, boasts a stronger winning record over the past year, indicating consistent performance at his level of play.

The players' choice of tournaments reflects differing strategies, with Shin achieving better results at lower-level events and Vrbensky facing tougher opposition more regularly. Vrbensky's ability to perform against higher-ranked opponents could be a crucial factor.

On career surfaces, Shin's preference for indoor hard courts may not be heavily tested unless the match takes place on such a surface. Should the match enter a deciding set, Shin holds the advantage with a higher winning percentage in such situations.

Considering these factors, Woobin Shin, with his consistent year-long performance and ability to clinch deciding sets, emerges as the more likely winner in this upcoming tennis encounter against Michael Vrbensky.